<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Alan Porter&#039;s Weblog &#187; White Paper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/category/white-paper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter</link>
	<description>being various posts about selected happenings at WebWorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:57:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Parcel Publishing in an Agile World &#8211; New white paper available.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/2010/05/21/parcel-publishing-in-an-agile-world-new-white-paper-available/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/2010/05/21/parcel-publishing-in-an-agile-world-new-white-paper-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 12:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aporter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[White Paper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Traditional publishing tools have a single pipeline that moves the source content to the deliverable format. In most cases this means that once a system has been defined, it becomes locked and can only be used for that specific route. Adding new output formats or making adjustments to meet new requirements means starting from scratch [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traditional publishing tools have a single pipeline that moves the source content to the deliverable format. In most cases this means that once a system has been defined, it becomes locked and can only be used for that specific route. Adding new output formats or making adjustments to meet new requirements means starting from scratch and developing parallel processes. This effect is magnified in tools and processes that combine the content authoring and publishing in one environment.</p>
<p><span id="more-146"></span>While this approach may be the most efficient to meet one single defined need, or solve one single problem, it is not scalable and can soon lead to development dead ends and an inability to meet new customer requirements. In an agile development environment this can cause real problems.</p>
<p>ePublisher is unique in that it uses the concept of Parcel Publishing to deliver unmatched flexibility and scalability.</p>
<p>Parcel Publishing uses a series of pipelines with well-defined start and end points that break the publishing process down into a series of discrete segments.</p>
<p><strong>Want to know more about Parcel Publishing? Ask for a copy of the latest WebWorks White Paper, and we&#8217;ll be happy to send it to you.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/2010/05/21/parcel-publishing-in-an-agile-world-new-white-paper-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good security is not about patching holes..</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/2010/02/24/good-security-is-not-about-patching-holes/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/2010/02/24/good-security-is-not-about-patching-holes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aporter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Paper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/?p=140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in January, I posted a piece on this blog asking the question &#8220;Is Your Online Help A Security Risk?&#8221; The post was the result of our own recent experiences that lead to us issuing a security advisory for WebWorks Help 5. 
During the course of our investigations we came to believe that this was an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in January, I posted <a href="http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/2010/01/08/is-your-online-help-a-security-risk/">a piece on this blog</a> asking the question <strong>&#8220;Is Your Online Help A Security Risk?&#8221;</strong> The post was the result of our own recent experiences that lead to us issuing a security advisory for WebWorks Help 5. </p>
<p>During the course of our investigations we came to believe that this was <strong>an issue that should be discussed more openly</strong>. In particular we felt an obligation to help raise awareness of how and why you need to look at your Online Help as a potential security risk.<span id="more-140"></span></p>
<p>Following that original post we planned to host a webinar on the subject. It turned out to be one of the most popular webinars we have ever held and was oversubscribed &#8211; twice. That single webinar turned into a series of three.</p>
<p>For anyone who was unable to attend, we have now collected the information presented in those webinars in a new <strong>WebWorks White Paper.</strong></p>
<p>The white paper includes sections on:</p>
<ul>
<li>Background to our own interest in Online Help security issues.</li>
<li>Notes on industry trends.</li>
<li>Why Online Help is particularly vulnerable.</li>
<li>Security as process (the title of this post comes from that section).</li>
<li>Taking steps to ensure that you are protected.</li>
</ul>
<p>If you would like a copy of <strong>&#8220;Is Your Online Help A Security Risk?&#8221;</strong> either leave a comment with your email address below, or <a href="aporter@webworks.com">email me directly </a> with your request.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/2010/02/24/good-security-is-not-about-patching-holes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WIKI Publishing White Paper &#8211; now available in eBook format.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/2009/03/02/wiki-publishing-white-paper-now-available-in-ebook-format/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/2009/03/02/wiki-publishing-white-paper-now-available-in-ebook-format/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aporter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wiki]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week we officially announced the publication of our newest white paper &#8220;WHY USE A WIKI? &#8211; An Introduction to the Latest Online Publishing Format.&#8221;
For the first week we only offered the paper to people who requested a copy directly after seeing the announcements on various sites such as Twitter, FaceBook, LinkedIn etc., as well [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week we officially announced the publication of our newest white paper <strong>&#8220;WHY USE A WIKI? &#8211; An Introduction to the Latest Online Publishing Format.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>For the first week we only offered the paper to people who requested a copy directly after seeing the announcements on various sites such as <a href="http://twitter.com/webworks_com">Twitter</a>, <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/WebWorkscom/7950277923">FaceBook</a>, <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&amp;gid=43903&amp;trk=anet_ug_hm">LinkedIn </a>etc., as well as through the <a href="http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/wwp-users/">wwp-users group.</a></p>
<p>From various conversations over the last twelve months or so, I knew that interest in using wikis for delivering online content was high, but I never expected the response that the announcement of the paper generated. I spent a significant amount of my time last week just sending out PDF copies of the wiki white paper.</p>
<p><span id="more-73"></span></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-74" src="http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/files/2009/03/wiki_wp_ebook.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="221" /></p>
<p>Initial feedback has been very positive:</p>
<p>- <em>&#8220;A  very good intro into the world of wikis and how you have<br />
implemented them at  WebWorks and in ePublisher.&#8221;</em><br />
- <em>&#8220;Excellent new wiki publishing white  paper.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Given the paper&#8217;s unprecedented popularity, we decided to try a little experiment and convert the WHite Paper into an eBook format so that it would be easier to deliver and more accessible.</p>
<p>If you have a Blackberry or an iPhone you can now download a copy of <strong>&#8220;WHY USE A WIKI?&#8221;</strong> using the free <strong><a href="http://www.shortcovers.com/mobile.html">shortcovers eBook reader</a>,</strong> or you can <strong><a href="http://www.shortcovers.com/shortcovers/Why-Use-A-Wiki/sc-PLviyb9_BEWmhFzPF93CRA/page1.html">read it online HERE</a>.</strong></p>
<p>If you would prefer a PDF copy, then just send me a note to aporter@webworks.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/2009/03/02/wiki-publishing-white-paper-now-available-in-ebook-format/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to get people to use a wiki? &#8211; Invite them to a party.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/2009/01/09/how-to-get-people-to-use-a-wiki-invite-them-to-a-party/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/2009/01/09/how-to-get-people-to-use-a-wiki-invite-them-to-a-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aporter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WebWorks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wiki]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday evening I was putting the finishing touches to my upcoming white paper on the use of wikis as an online publishing format, and was thinking back about the techniques we used here at WebWorks to make the use of our internal wiki such a success.
Here&#8217;s what I wrote in the white paper:
While the main [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday evening I was putting the finishing touches to my upcoming white paper on the use of wikis as an online publishing format, and was thinking back about the techniques we used here at WebWorks to make the use of our internal wiki such a success.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I wrote in the white paper:</p>
<p><em><strong>While the main focus of the wiki may be technical, you can speed acceptance by seeding the wiki with other topics that may have a broader appeal. For instance one of the things we use the wiki for at WebWorks is organizing the company Christmas Party!</strong></em></p>
<p><span id="more-57"></span></p>
<p>By posting information on something that everyone was interested in, and wanted information on, the wiki quickly became seen as an authoritative source of information on what was happening in the company. Rather than have information going around in uncoordinated email threads, it was in a central location where everyone had access.  By asking for menu suggestions and comments, we also introduced the idea of using the wiki for feedback and commenting.</p>
<p>By using the wiki to organize a fun event in which everyone had a vested interest, the acceptance and usage of the wiki was a lot quicker, more user driven, and far more acceptable than any imposed mandate of &#8220;you must use the wiki from now on.&#8221;</p>
<p>And the end result of that particular wiki project last month?</p>
<div id="attachment_58" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/files/2009/01/xmasparty.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-58" src="http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/files/2009/01/xmasparty.jpg" alt="WebWorks.com 2008 Christmas Dinner" width="300" height="200" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">WebWorks.com 2008 Christmas Dinner</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/2009/01/09/how-to-get-people-to-use-a-wiki-invite-them-to-a-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Riding the Wiki Bus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/2008/12/04/riding-the-wiki-bus/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/2008/12/04/riding-the-wiki-bus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aporter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[White Paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wiki]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If anyone’s heard me do a presentation over the last twelve months, you know I can’t get through one without using the word “WIKI.”
I’ll admit I’ve become a big proponent of wikis, and the possibilities they offer for a more intelligent and targeted delivery of information in a way that doesn’t just project information to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone’s heard me do a presentation over the last twelve months, you know I can’t get through one without using the word <strong>“WIKI.”</strong></p>
<p>I’ll admit I’ve become a big proponent of wikis, and the possibilities they offer for a more intelligent and targeted delivery of information in a way that doesn’t just project information to the end-user; but actually engages them in a bi-directional exchange of knowledge.</p>
<p>I’m currently doing a fair amount of background reading on various aspects of wiki technology and the use of wikis for an <strong>upcoming white paper on Wiki Publishing.<br />
</strong><br />
What I hadn’t thought about until I started the research is why this open editing web based publishing environment is actually called a wiki. I had heard that it was an acronym for <em>“What I Know Is.” </em>But it turns out that this is more accurately a backronym.</p>
<p>Wiki doesn’t stand for anything.</p>
<p><strong>“Wiki” is the Hawaiian word for “fast.”</strong></p>
<p>The story goes that Ward Cunnigham, the creator of the first wiki site , installed in 1995, was looking for a name that reflected how quick it was to set up a his new style of website and remembered a counter clerk at Honolulu International Airport telling him to use the “wiki-wiki” shuttle bus.</p>
<div id="attachment_45" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 346px"><a href="http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/files/2008/12/wiki_wiki_bus.jpg"><img src="http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/files/2008/12/wiki_wiki_bus.jpg" alt="Wiki Wiki Shuttle Bus at Honolulu Airport" width="336" height="361" class="size-full wp-image-45" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Wiki Wiki Shuttle Bus at Honolulu Airport</p></div>
<p>Well this is one bus ride I, and the rest of the WebWorks team, is committed to. Hop on board and join us – they’ll be some interesting stops over the coming months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/2008/12/04/riding-the-wiki-bus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DITA Publishing &#8211; &quot;Free or Not To Free&quot;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/2008/03/07/dita-publishing-free-or-not-to-free/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/2008/03/07/dita-publishing-free-or-not-to-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aporter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DITA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Paper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webworks.com/weblog/aporter/?permalink=DITA_Publishing_Free_or_Not_To_Free.txt</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just came across this great post entitled DITA Backlash? on  Anne Rockley&#8217;s excellent blog. In the post Anne makes an excellent point.
Free tools are not always the best tools – output
Your job is to produce user guides, help systems, training material, etc. It is not merely to produce topics. The tools you use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just came across this <a href="http://rockley.com/blog/?p=50">great post entitled <strong>DITA Backlash?</strong></a> on  Anne Rockley&#8217;s excellent blog. In the post Anne makes an excellent point.</p>
<blockquote><p>Free tools are not always the best tools – output</p>
<p>Your job is to produce user guides, help systems, training material, etc. It is not merely to produce topics. The tools you use to create PDF and CHM files is as important as the authoring tool you use.</p></blockquote>
<p>This paragraph had a particular resonance for me as I&#8217;ve not long finished authoring a white paper on just this very subject. The paper, <strong>&#8220;DITA PUBLISHING: The true costs of taking your DITA content online&#8221;</strong>, is scheduled to be released at the upcoming <a href="http://www.cm-strategies.com/">CMS/DITA Conference</a> in Santa Clara in April, but if any readers of this blog would like an advance copy, just drop me an email (aporter@webworks.com) and I&#8217;d be happy to send it your way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.webworks.com/aporter/2008/03/07/dita-publishing-free-or-not-to-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
